 |
 |
Thursday, December 23, 2004
A Watched Pot
"It is cruel, you know, that music should be so beautiful."
- Benjamin Britten
For all a blog lays bare, those perturbations whose orbit is most acute to our souls escape exposure.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 11:52 AM ·
Friday, December 03, 2004
No Blood for Coca
I've been vewy vewy busy. Accordingly, no blog posts for some time. Really, I don't even have the time to post this one, which is why I'll just say, "Damn Skippy," and direct y'all to this link.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:32 PM ·
Thursday, November 11, 2004
One Need Only Read Jeff
I was preparing to launch into a snarky diatribe against Former President Jimmy Carter concerning his decision to lionize and eulogize Yasser Arafat as "a powerful human symbol" and not include "of evil," but as is often the case, Jeff Goldstein beat me to it and did so with more wit than I could possibly muster. To wit:Reached for comment, pieces of dead Israeli school children blown to bits by Arafat-directed suicide bombers over the years asked if former President Carter "wouldn't mind fucking right off." Only they said it in Hebrew. Oh, and in the interest of piling on, Drudge has linked to a story about the unctious Suha Arafat's deal to receive $22m a year from the Palestinian Authority. Has this woman no shame? With this kind of leadership, it is no surprise that the Palestinians are living in squalor - they need not look to Israel to explicate their lot.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 9:39 PM ·
Thursday, October 14, 2004
The Arizona Debate
Nutshell: The Cards rule.
Update (10/27/04): Ugh.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:22 AM ·
Sunday, October 10, 2004
Zen and the Art of the Rant
I've been made aware of two blogs about which I was previously unaware.
One of them is brand spankin' new and belongs to the august personage of one Abram Siemsen. This dude is smart, multi-talented and snarky which make him, in my mind, a blogstar potentate. I'm guessing his blog will be consistently provocative and his position vis-a-vis political philosophy will be hard to pin down, all of which make for a great read. I was vexed by his very first (well second) post.
The other and rather excellent blog is The Ranting Haze. A colleague of mine directed me to this blog ("Haze" is a friend of his.) I have yet to determine much in the way of details about the guy responsible for this blog other than that he's damn well-spoken and seems to be neck-deep in the study of medicine (or related.) He seems to be either a partisan Republican or Libertarian, but in either case, his blog is informative and witty.
Perhaps I shall get motivated and update my blogroll someday...
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 2:40 PM ·
Saturday, October 09, 2004
Wash U Debate
Nutshell: Bush was articulate. This man is clearly not the simpleton the media would have us believe him to be. Kerry is likewise articulate, perhaps moreso, but this debate reinforced the image I have of him as a Seth Pecksniff, "a direction-post which is always telling the way... , and never gets there."
Anyway, having read a truly ridiculous number of debate blognalyses, I have to quote an amusing bit from this summation by Daisy Cutter.My 11-year-old interjects this: "I bet if the audience could talk, they would ask what his plan is."
Indeed, the audience is skeptical. A voter asks, "Will you look into the camera and tell us you won't raise taxes?" Then ... Lerch-Munster approaches the camera and it looks like he's coming into my living room. Get out of here!! Hide the children. Is he taking a head count to charge us per person?! Scary. Heh.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:06 AM ·
Tuesday, September 21, 2004
Hippocrates, Gorgias of Leontini, a 3-inch-nail, and Thou
Disconcerting.An Aberdeenshire joiner has hit out after waiting nearly 24 hours to have a 3in nail removed from one of his fingers.
John Milne went to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary's accident and emergency department to have the nail removed but, after becoming increasingly frustrated, he left 22 hours later with it still in his finger. There are few things which demonstrate, to my mind, the sophistry of collectivists more clearly than socialized medicine. Governments can no more 'poof' a private good into abundance that it can 'poof' a system for innovating said good into existence that could trump simple competition. In the attempt to do so, one encounters Mr. Law of Unintended Consequences in the form of a digitally suffused 3-inch-nail, or worse. So the proposition for the collectivist here (and elsewhere) is, “am I willing to sacrifice fundamental questions of quality assurance along with the hope of innovation and without even any guarantee of quantity, in return for the attribution of 'free-to-all'?” A faustian gamble.
Whatever else one might say about him, Dan Smoot offers a poly-sci angle on the question:Whenever government enters a field of private activity, that field becomes a political battleground. Whenever you mix politics with medicine, doctoring becomes a political instead of a medical activity. As well as becomming a bureaucratic instead of medical activity.
These considerations are outside the field of vision for these would-be Protagorases as they have diefied the “narrative” and thus fallen captive to it's charm. To wit, Gorgias tells us:“The spoken word is a mighty lord, and for all that it is insubstantial and imperceptible it has superhuman effects. It can put an end to fear do away with distress, generate happiness, and increase pity…When the power of the incantation meets the beliefs of a person’s mind, it beguiles, persuades, alters by its sorcery…techniques which cause the mind to err and deceive beliefs…For if everyone could remember everything that had happened in the past, could understand everything that was happening in the present, and could foresee everything that would happen in the future, the spoken word would not have the power that it has.” But it cannot invent magnetic resonance imaging.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:11 AM ·
Monday, September 20, 2004
Sometimes a Cigar is...
Virginia Postrel asks:Watching news reports of John Kerry's latest campaign appearance, a pressing question occurs to me: Why don't politicians use lavalier microphones when they speak without a podium? Do media consultants tell them it's more effective to talk loudly by carrying a big stick? Better yet, why not a headset mic so they can execute the complicated choreography?
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:59 AM ·
Monday, September 06, 2004
A Spade is a Spade
Item 1 is an Op-Ed by Ralph Peters which includes the following:If Muslim religious leaders around the world will not publicly condemn the taking of children as hostages and their subsequent slaughter ? if those "men of faith" will not issue a condemnation without reservations or caveats ? then no one need pretend any longer that all religions are equally sound and moral. My feelings on religion notwithstanding, I think it's time we get honest and let everyone know that the single largest — indeed the defining — component of the War on Terror is a war against radical Islam. Inasmuch as there are actually some few "Moderate Muslims" (ie. Muslims who believe in the separation of church and state,) this is not a war against all Islam, but certainly most of it.
Item 2 is this post at Chicago-Boyz entitled, "The Ideology of Total War: The Wars on Civilians" and it includes this quote from Item 2a, Jane Novak's post, "The Path to School #1" attributed to Imam Al-Sudayyis of the Grand Mosque in Mecca:You have revived the hopes of this nation through your blessed Jihad. By Allah, be patient until, with Allah's help, one of two good things will be awarded you: either victory or martyrdom. Our hearts are with you; our prayers are dedicated to you. The Islamic nation will not spare money or effort in support of your cause. The piece goes on to make a rational case for what the overwhelming majority of westerners know through cultural conditioning, namely that killing children in the name of politics, Allah or any damn thing else, is BARBARISM — you know, an act committed by the product of a primitive culture.
Though I don't recall the source, not long after September 11, some bureaucrat or other from Italy (I believe) dared to suggest that western culture was indeed superior to Muslim culture. He was characterized by the ephebish European press as a Neanderthal, but I'll stand squarely in his court until such time as the Imams and Mullahs show as much concern for innocent children as they do for French journalism.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:41 AM ·
Thursday, September 02, 2004
Evolutionary Civil Development and Terror
John Kerry wants to fight a "more sensitive" war on terror. It seems strange that it must be said so often and with so little impact, but I’m all for pissin’ in the ocean, so here goes: The level of consciousness (vis-à-vis one’s social context) necessary to be able to frame conflict in terms of sensitivity is simply not something to which fully two-thirds of the population of the planet are availed. Let me try that again: Kerry’s position requires all negotiators can agree to certain philosophical ground rules. I am suggesting that the environmental requirements by which such a philosophy becomes possible in the mind of any given person are plainly not present in most of the world.
I’m frustrated that it is so difficult to find coverage of the siege at School #1. I’m just not open-minded enough to think that a dead sea’s worth of sensitivity would have any effect other than emboldening more – and more horrific examples – of this.
As an aside, it is one of many examples of which I am made conscious, of the power of distributed systems that Stan of Logic and Sanity is livetranslatiblogging the Russian wire reports about the siege.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 11:15 PM ·
Tuesday, August 31, 2004
The Zeitgeist of the Last Fifteen Minutes
Watching the RNC, I wonder whether there might not be a lot of Americans for whom, having grown nauseated in digesting an inexorable flood of yank-bashing, this convention is something of a balm. The progenitor of this self-flagellation is my parent's generation - the sanctimonious "Boomers." Deciding in their adolescence that they should "speak truth to power," the boomer media managerial hierarchy, continue to hold forth thusly, callow in their anopsia to the fact that they have become the power. In their sophomoric identification with Orwell, they fail to realize that the "nuanced" dialectic of Europe and the American post-modern left has calcified into it's own mental authoritarianism. The most frightening and elucidating manifestation of this is the way in which the indictments leveled by the fortunate recipients of their parents' sacrifice in WWII, have been appropriated by the Muslim fascists.
I foresee the precipitous rise of the South Park Republican.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 11:38 PM ·
Friday, July 30, 2004
Object Permanence and the Postmodern Milieu
It is amusing, no? Rational analysis, unwittingly employed by the wooly-headed, ironic, effete chatterers, for whom the "new age" is not a laughing matter, in the attempt to "deconstruct" those institutions for which rational analysis is fundamental. It is an intellectual bootstrapping that, in its smug crusade against modernity, cannot avoid its own blade. In its wake is left a humanity which was promised the opportunity for real self-determination as assured in the form of an empiricism which the priests of narcissism have now turned against itself. As these autists hold forth that George Bush would surreptitiously have us in the 19th Century, they predicate this sort of prevarication with the kind of philosophical underpinnings that rather overtly embrace a return to the 40th Century - B.C.E. It should come as little surprise that Democrats respond with ennui elation to the unctuous principles of Ol' Weather-Vain Kerry.
The French, arbiters of all things sophisticated, are the paragon of postmodernity and as such, be warned that warmongering James Lileks should not be trusted in his completely unwarranted criticism of this great counterweight to U.S. hegemony. /sarcasm
Seriously, IMO, Lileks is one of the unmitigated stars blogdom and a brilliant writer. That I don't have the bleat in my blogroll is a problem soon to be remedied.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:07 AM ·
Sunday, July 04, 2004
Northwestern US Secedes, Joins China
"Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place."
- Frederic Bastiat Coming to a hubristic legislature near you: Repealing Private Property. It seems that King County, Washington eco-tards are attempting to arrogate to themselves the decision about what land-owners can or cannot do with their land. From the article:Known as the 65-10 Rule, it calls for landowners to set aside 65 percent of their property and keep it in its natural, vegetative state. According to the rule, nothing can be built on this land, and if a tree is cut down, for example, it must be replanted. Building anything is out of the question. The pressure group responsible for this abdication of sanity is known as 1000 Friends of Washington. Quite frankly, fuck them.
When I was a raffish youthful pop-musician, I was company to pollyannas who were enamored of yelling, "You'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes!" While I doubt they had the balls to turn such posturing into action, I am much more confident in the resolve that land-owners will demonstrate in their response to attempts at expropriation of said land.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 1:00 AM ·
Friday, May 28, 2004
Super Sized Asshat
The Blogfather has today a link to this great little piece by Doug Kern over at TCS about the interminably idiotic Morgan Spurlock. I doubt I could add to this article, but I shan't be shy about quoting my favorite bit:He has inaugurated a new genre of documentary: the "Freak Does Something Disgusting And Gets Sick" movie. Such documentaries can only advance our understanding of human endurance, not to mention abnormal psychology. Perhaps we can look forward to such titles as:
"Make That a Double," wherein our intrepid filmmaker resolves to drink alcohol as his beverage of choice for all three meals. If asked to "make that a double?" he must say yes. And he must eventually try every liquor on the premises. Result? His liver looks like a Brillo pad and his brain looks like Spongebob Squarepants. Moral: fight Big Alcohol by outlawing demon rum. (It's been tried? Shut up, history boy. That was before the Internet, so it doesn't count.)
"Unlimited Trips To The Pasta Bar? Sure!" It's the same as Super Size Me!, but at Golden Corral. Result: Spurlock explodes on day five. Moral: Hurray for Golden Corral!
"I'll Have a Venti!" wherein our intrepid director takes all his drinks at Starbucks, paying the extra twenty cents for a super-grande mega-trough of energy-packed java when asked if he'd like to do so. Result: jittery, paranoid, and voluble, Spurlock becomes a freelance writer. Moral: caffeine is the backbone of a free and literate society. Had Spurlock managed to do himself in by way of Big Macs, he would have certainly qualified for a Darwin Award.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 2:26 PM ·
Friday, April 30, 2004
Charter Cable Sodomy
After having been a long-time customer of Charter's Cable services, and having never missed a payment, I recently forgot to mail my check. Honest mistake. Now, I've been getting a lot of pressure from my wife to trash Charter and go Dish because of the price point and Charter's abysmal customer service. She's even gone so far as to make an installation appointment with Dish without telling me. So I sent in the check to Charter a couple days ago and called them today to see if they would be so kind as to turn in back on - no dice. I told them I would give them the check number - no dice. I told them I had an appointment to have Dish installed that I was planning to cancel because I wanted to keep Charter services and would they please recognize that I've been a good customer for several years - no dice.
So, I tried to cancel my services - they wouldn't do it until they receive payment. WTF??? So, If I were to suddenly go into some kind of financial trouble and couldn't make my payment, Charter would just keep billing me for a service I'm not even receiving until I pay them? WTF?!?
Suffice to say, I didn't cancel my Dish installation appointment.
UPDATE: As I've been googling on such niceties as "charter sucks" and "f*ck charter," I've discovered what appears to be a groundswell of disgust with the company. Can you say government-facilitated monopoly?
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 6:17 PM ·
Friday, February 20, 2004
'Breathalyzer in every car' bill demonstrates hubris of New Mexico Legislature
What has become of our great democracy?Some state lawmakers are convinced they have the answer to solve the D.W.I. epidemic and want to require everyone on the road to take a breathalyzer test before they can start the engine of any vehicle. It will be most unfortunate the first time that someone trying to escape a violent criminal can't start their car because they had one too many. I can think of several other such scenarios without any difficulty, but they are irrelevant because the issue is that this kind of legislation is simply not in keeping with the spirit upon which this country was founded.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 12:31 PM ·
Friday, January 23, 2004
Libertarian v. Conservative
The damn perspicacious Tyler Cowen has recently authored a post at Volokh regarding the difference between Libertarianism and Conservatism, which was itself a reference to an interview on 2blowhards with traditionalist conservative, Jim Kalb. It was my intention to post the second part of the little essay I was constructing on logic before anything else, but Dr. Cowen’s post was of such great interest to be an irresistible force as it were.
Right, so read the above and chew. I did so myself, and I was drawn to two particular items. Firstly, Dr. Cowen comments:We also can (and should) use positive arguments to determine whether implementing the conservative value-laden vision, or the libertarian competing lifestyles vision, will do more for human welfare. …and then Dr. Kalb suggests:…welfare state liberalism and ideological libertarianism are variations of the same thing. Both are basically concerned with satisfying individual preferences and both take all preferences as equal in worth. I think Dr. Kalb is suggesting that “liberalism” and “libertarianism” are both cut from the same enlightenment cloth. In other words, both systems are axiomatic, deterministic and reductionistic. His point becomes more clear when he contrasts both positions with “conservatism”They [liberals/libertarians] contrast with conservatism because conservatism says the human good is more complicated than everyone getting what he wants.
In the paper you mention here the emphasis is on methods more than goals. I say there that a "leftist" is someone who favors bureaucracy, a "libertarian" is someone who favors markets, and a "conservative" is someone favors tradition -- that is, who favors accepting institutions that have grown up more or less on their own terms. Leftists and libertarians in their different ways want to make everything completely rational and systematic, and conservatives reject that idea. I consider myself a libertarian, but I emphatically disagree with the suggestion that libertarianism is of necessity only compatible with some kind of objectivism. My libertarianism is only axiomatic in as much as its one axiom is that I am fundamentally ignorant of everything around me. I am a casualty of the knowledge problem and therefore I cannot simply be beholden to mores and traditions, because I strongly suspect the purveyors of them are just as ignorant as myself. That having been said, I have found myself slowly gravitating to traditional methods and modes of thought despite my skepticism. I consider the “competing lifestyles vision” which Dr. Cowen associates with libertarianism to be an inescapable fact – there can be no alternative save complete totalitarianism. Likewise, I consider the “value-laden vision” to be just as inescapable – even the most confused post-modernist demonstrates a “value system in practice” (if through no other action than just being alive) even if they won’t or can’t admit it – hell, can’t “rationality” or “objectivism” be or become a “value” or “tradition”?
Incidentally, I observe that while “conservatism” is ostensibly concerned with “conserving” the status quo and its attendant traditions, how does it confront the fact that “conservatives” today in this country are attempting to conserve modes of thought and behavior that may or may not be commensurate with the modes of thought and behavior that were being maintained by the “conservatives” of Mesopotamia circa 2,004 BC – which conservatives were maintaining the “correct” values? Additionally, inasmuch as conservatives cling to a particular value even in light of countervailing evidence, are they not demonstrating a rationalism or reductionism in the dogmatic adherence to said value? In that scenario, conservatism itself becomes an axiom from which the dogmatic posture is derived.
So let me attempt to sum up: Drs. Cowen and Kalb seem to be asserting that there are fundamental philosophical/epistemological differences between libertarianism and conservatism. Dr. Kalb seems to be suggesting that conservatism is in fact superior, while Dr. Cowen seems to be cautiously extending an invitation to consider the subject more deeply. My own assertion is that neither is superior nor expendable – in fact I assert that the two are nearly perfectly analogous to yin and yang. It seems to me that constructionism or libertarianism (or whatever other appellation by which it might be recognized) is the manifestation of the undeniable human compulsion to make things happen – while conservatism seems to me the primary way by which new ideas become practical, usable orthodoxy. How can we have one without the other?
One parting thought: my Music Theory professor Stephen Heinemann once said, “Music Theory is not a prescription for music; it is a description of music.” I think the same should be said about political philosophy.
Oh, and once again, I'm generally sorry that you had to read this inscrutable pap.
posted by Malaclypse the Tertiary at 11:08 PM ·
|
 |
|